June 15, 2015 By Douglas Bonderud 2 min read

It’s been more than a year since Heartbleed, but companies remain nervous about widely used encryption software OpenSSL. This is understandable since the preexisting vulnerability put millions of websites and email servers at risk. But a thorough audit of this open-source SSL/TLS offering is now underway. As reported by Threatpost, the project has just released four new patches — 1.0.2b, 1.0.1n, 1.0.0s and 0.9.8zg — to deal with a number of moderate and low-severity issues. Here’s a quick recap.

Cleared Out

The biggest news from these updates? Logjam is finally cleared. Officially tracked as CVE-2015-4000, Logjam stemmed from a problem with Diffie–Hellman key exchanges. With millions of HTTPS, SSH and VPN servers using identical prime numbers for their key exchange, it became possible for attackers to use the same number field sieve over and over again to break individual connections. More worrisome? A flaw in the TLS protocol allowed man-in-the-middle attackers to downgrade connection security by exploiting the Diffie–Hellman exchange to use easily cracked 512-bit cryptography, which was coded into SSL by law in 1990 and still remains in many older deployments. As noted by CIO, releases 1.0.2b and 1.0.1n toss out 512-bit altogether and will only support handshakes of 768 bits or better. In a future patch, this limit will be raised to 1024 bits.

Other Issues With OpenSSL

New OpenSSL patches also addressed several other low-severity issues such as potential memory corruption. In versions 1.0.1, 1.0.0 and 0.9.8, it was possible for a DTLS peer to receive application data between the ChangeCipherSpec and Finished messages. When buffered, this data could generate an “invalid free,” resulting in segmentation faults or memory corruption. According to Softpedia, there’s also a fix for denial-of-service (DoS) conditions that caused out-of-bounds reads in the X509_cmp_time function, which is supposed to check the length of the ANS1_TIME string but may read a few bytes out-of-bounds. Combined with X509’s ability to accept arbitrarily assigned fractional seconds in its time string, it’s possible for attackers to create fake, malformed certificates that crash applications designed to verify these certificates.

Alone, none of these vulnerabilities is particularly damning, but they’re further proof that open-source legacy code often comes with a host of hidden problems. It appears, however, that the OpenSSL project is making good on its promise to evaluate existing code line-by-line and address these vulnerabilities before another Heartbleed-type event occurs. Best bet? Update OpenSSL ASAP and keep an eye on all future updates.

More from

SoaPy: Stealthy enumeration of Active Directory environments through ADWS

10 min read - Introduction Over time, both targeted and large-scale enumeration of Active Directory (AD) environments have become increasingly detected due to modern defensive solutions. During our internship at X-Force Red this past summer, we noticed FalconForce’s SOAPHound was becoming popular for enumerating Active Directory environments. This tool brought a new perspective to Active Directory enumeration by performing collection via Active Directory Web Services (ADWS) instead of directly through Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) as other AD enumeration tools had in the past.…

Smoltalk: RCE in open source agents

26 min read - Big shoutout to Hugging Face and the smolagents team for their cooperation and quick turnaround for a fix! Introduction Recently, I have been working on a side project to automate some pentest reconnaissance with AI agents. Just after I started this project, Hugging Face announced the release of smolagents, a lightweight framework for building AI agents that implements the methodology described in the ReAct paper, emphasizing reasoning through iterative decision-making. Interestingly, smolagents enables agents to reason and act by generating…

4 ways to bring cybersecurity into your community

4 min read - It’s easy to focus on technology when talking about cybersecurity. However, the best prevention measures rely on the education of those who use technology. Organizations training their employees is the first step. But the industry needs to expand the concept of a culture of cybersecurity and take it from where it currently stands as an organizational responsibility to a global perspective.When every person who uses technology — for work, personal use and school — views cybersecurity as their responsibility, it…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today